Now they are complaining that the computer models aren’t inconvenient enough.
“Hadow fears that the current climate models developed by scientists may not be extreme enough.”
Let’s look again at how the ice gazers describe this year’s forecasts and scramble to adjust to realities…
Weather in June and July was supportive of a major summer sea ice loss in 2009, but the weather in August and September changed completely from that of earlier in the summer, preventing extreme sea ice loss late in the summer. While no new record was set in 2009, the September 2009 sea ice extent was still much reduced compared to 1979–2000 mean conditions.
Until they can accurate predict the weather for a day from now, they may want to withhold judgement on long term forecasts.
In other words, the models are always wrong. Ergo, they can not be relied upon to develop policy so anyone who does is patently irresponsible and has lost all credibility.
It is always nice to see them admit that they are wanting the models to be extreme and not lean towards realism. Until I hear that the global warming crowd is wanting to solve a realistic problem and not just tax the west, I cannot find them credible.