Steyn on Not So Great Britain

This is the logical dead end of the Nanny State. When William Beveridge laid out his blueprint for the British welfare regime in 1942, his goal was the “abolition of want” to be accomplished by “co-operation between the State and the individual.” In attempting to insulate the citizenry from life’s vicissitudes, Sir William succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. As I write in my book: “Want has been all but abolished. Today, fewer and fewer Britons want to work, want to marry, want to raise children, want to lead a life of any purpose or dignity.”

Replace “Britons” with “People” and you have 80% of the planet fitting that description.

Big Government means small citizens: It corrodes the integrity of a people, catastrophically. Within living memory, the city in flames on our TV screens every night governed a fifth of the earth’s surface and a quarter of its population. When you’re imperialists on that scale, there are bound to be a few mishaps along the way. But nothing the British Empire did to its subject peoples has been as total and catastrophic as what a post-great Britain did to its own.

There are lessons for all of us there.

Occupy that. I’m going to start reading Steyn’s columns to my kids at bedtime. Forget the stupid fairy books they make me read to them now.

Global, call your webmaster

Global TV Video Panel

On the top left of the Watch Online grid, on the home page of Global TV
, they are linking to an episode of Spring Wipeout. The Title: “Spring Wipeout” The teaser: “Prime Minister Harper’s tour of Canada continues”

You have got to be kidding me. Doesn’t anyone have editors anymore in their workflow? I know how easy it is to make a mistake but this is getting stupid.

This is why the Right mocks the MSM.

Excellent reporting CW Media. Under the headline of “Canadians ok with coalition” on the Global News website, I found this gem of a conclusion.

The Conservatives say a Liberal-NDP coalition government would be bad for the country, but Canadians wouldn’t have a problem with it.

From reading that paragraph, I’d think that a large sampling of Canadians would not have a problem with what will happen if the voters choose to send the parties back with the same numbers they currently have. Iggy will vote down the first budget and continue with the previously signed coalition agreement with the NDP. The Bloc, having to prop up the coalition, will get bribed to keep the coalition alive on everything.

But that ISN’T WHAT THE POLL SAID!!!! Reading the next paragraph, it makes it very clear that the left doesn’t want the Conservatives with a majority. Ya, no kidding. That’s why getting out the vote is important for the left. It’s too bad for them that you can’t vote while playing World of Warcraft in mommy’s basement.

A new Ipsos Reid poll conducted for Global National and Postmedia News indicates the majority of Canadians would prefer to see a Liberal-NDP coalition government (54 per cent) than a Conservative majority government (46 per cent).

It is the next paragraph that should have changed the thesis statement of the article.

Also, almost half of Canadians (48 per cent) support the idea of a coalition of opposition parties forming the government.

A little more than half (52 per cent) of Canadians oppose the idea.

If that isn’t obvious enough that this bit of reporting had the wrong conclusion, this paragraph should be the cherry on top.

If a coalition of all three opposition parties – Liberals, NDP and Bloc – were to be formed, 59 per cent of Canadians would like to see NDP leader Jack Layton lead it. Just 27 per cent would like to see Ignatieff do so, and 14 per cent would choose Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe for the job.

Here, let me take a go on the headline and first paragraph of the article to remove the pro-Liberal spin.

My headline based on the poll data:

Poll shows Canadians want the Status Quo.

My thesis based on the poll data:

Canadians want a Conservative Minority and they don’t want to see Ignatieff as Prime Minister.

As Kate at SDA would say, “Not Waiting for the Astroid.”

Media Matters Changes the Rules

Is this serious?

That’s rich.

I guess you can only score points and make it political if the person wants to encourage that babies actually survive and takes on an abortion clinic or doctor, not the opposite.

This is the reason he went crazy.

The angry manifesto repeatedly refers to humans as “filth” and demands that the Discovery Channel “stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants.”

How will the CBC Spin This?

The head of Iran’s soccer federation issued a public apology and a member of his staff resigned after the federation mistakenly sent a New Year’s greeting to its counterpart in Israel, Iranian officials announced Sunday.

There are dozens of editors working overtime at the CBC, trying to figure out how to blame this on George W Bush.